FROM
THE EDITOR
Multi-core, multi-processor, SMP, CMP, multi-CPU, ILP, TLP, hyperthreading, cache-coherency… With the alphabet soup of overloaded, misused and misunderstood terminology around the concept of cooperation between processing elements, Bryon Moyer finds parallelism just about everywhere and just couldn’t keep it to himself. Our latest feature lays it out.
Thanks for reading! If there's anything we can do to make our publications more useful to you, please let us know at: comments@embeddedtechjournal.com. If you'd rather sound off in public, please post your comments or questions in our new Journal Forums.
Kevin
Morris – Editor-in-Chief
Techfocus Media, Inc.
|
EVENTS and ANNOUNCEMENTS
As a customer using programmable logic, claims of low-power leadership can get tiresome and confusing. But in reality, there is only one true low power leader. With power consumption as low as 5 µW, Actel's ultra-low-power IGLOO® FPGAs are the industry's leading low-power programmable logic devices.
Learn more.
|
Attend Windows Embedded Acceleration Workshops
An Acceleration Workshop is a full-day, hands-on learning experience with a Windows Embedded® platform. Designed for professional embedded developers, and presented by experienced system integrators.
Get a head start on your next device design.
|
Powering FPGA-Based Systems … Simply
DC/DC µModuleTM regulators are complete system-in-package power supplies, ready to power your FPGA-based systems. These powerful DC/DC circuits include the inductor and MOSFETs and are simplified to resemble an IC. From low to high power, these DC/DC µModule systems are backed by Linear Technology’s rigorous testing.
Click here for more
|
High Efficiency Power Supply Design for FPGA-Based Systems.
Performance of FPGA-based systems depends on the electrical and thermal performance of DC/DC regulators. A properly packaged power management device improves regulation accuracy and stability while removing heat quickly. DC/DC µModuleTM regulators from Linear Technology are complete system-in-package power supplies in an IC form-factor with optimum layout and very low thermal impedance.
Click here for more
|
Xilinx Virtex(r) -5 FPGA Development kit for PCIe(r)
Cut design time, power and cost with built-in PCIe block.
Get started now with this PCI-SIG compliant solution from Xilinx.
Buy kit
|
Mixed-Signal ASICs from ChipX
- USB 2.0 & PCI Express ASIC Designs and FPGA conversion
- USB-IF & PCI-SIG certified ASICs
- Standard Cell, Hybrid ASIC and Structured ASIC solutions
- Low NRE, fast Time to Market, USB & PCIe ASIC platforms
Win a PCIe Development Board click here
|
NEW!! IC Journal - Do you love Embedded Tech Journal? We're happy to announce our new IC Design and Verification Journal. It'll be just like Embedded Tech Journal except, you know, about ASICs and stuff.
Subscribe today for free.
|
|
|

|
It’s the Parallelism, Stupid!
(Bryon Moyer)
A couple years ago I was participating in a standards meeting of multicore insiders, and a discussion ensued as to how to use such phrases as “multicore,” “multiprocessor,” etc. The discussion went on for a bit, making it pretty clear that this was not a cut-and-dried issue even amongst the cognoscenti.
Shortly after that I was having another conversation and was using the term “multicore” rather loosely, and at some point was, with great certitude, corrected in my usage. Which gave me the sense that such phrases may have as much value as buzzword-of-the-month (no one cares about multiprocessor anymore) as technical term.
Fast forward a couple years, and at the recent Multicore Expo, VDC presented some survey data they had taken regarding multicore usage expectations. But their statistics were somewhat complicated by the fact that the users they had sampled weren’t unanimous in their understanding of what the term “multicore” meant – they were including multiprocessor designs as well.
[more]
|
|